AFSL Responsible Manager Courses
Responsible Manager RG 105
What is an Australian Financial Services licence (AFSL)?
You must have an Australian Financial Services Licence to conduct a financial services business. AFS Licensees have a general obligation to provide efficient, honest and fair financial services. You must comply with the conditions of your AFS licence and the Corporations Act 2001.
AFSL Responsible Manager
Responsible Managers are the people that a licensee appoints to demonstrate to ASIC that it has the knowledge, skills and experience required to provide the financial services it is authorised to on its Australian Financial Services licence (AFSL).
A Responsible Manager is a key individual within a business. They can supervise operations in a few ways:
- Oversee the conduct of authorised representatives who trade financial instruments or provide advice
- Be a company director appointed as a responsible manager
- Serve purely as a responsible manager, monitoring licensing compliance and non financial risks.
Explore our Responsible Manager Courses
Questions about your AFSL or compliance requirements?
Check out our Compliance Consultants directory and find experts who can help with those tricky questions.
Responsible Manager Training and Courses
Whether becoming a responsible manager is the next step in your career, you’re being nominated as one, or you need continuing professional development, we have a solution for every stage. Our responsible manager programs provide all you need to know about your roles and responsibilities and the industry regulations licensees must comply with – wherever you are along your RM journey.
-
Responsible Manager Fundamentals Course
What responsible managers need to know about their role and responsibilities, and the industry regulations licensees must comply with.Learn More -
Regulation of Australian Financial Services
Designed for those taking on the role of a RM (AFSL) and/or needing a refresher of Australian regulations.Learn More -
AFSL Responsible Manager CPD
ASIC requires that Responsible Managers maintain and update their knowledge and skills to maintain their AFSL.Learn More
Frequently Asked Questions
ASIC doesn’t specify how many CPD hours are required for Responsible Managers of AFS licensees.
However, the CPD must be ‘adequate’ and assist a responsible manager to:
- maintain knowledge and skills that are appropriate for their activities and responsibilities, and are consistent with any applicable training standards
- update their knowledge and skills, especially in areas where there is continual change
- develop new knowledge and skills to assist with their current role or roles contemplated in the near future.
Our AFSL Responsible Manager CPD awards 15 hours/points. This affords licensees flexibility to make up the balance of the widely accepted industry standard of 20 hours via other activities, such as industry reading, inhouse training, and industry event attendance.
RG 105 AFS licensing: Organisational competence is a guide for Australian financial services (AFS) licensees and AFS licence applicants.
This guide describes what ASIC looks for when assessing compliance with the ‘organisational competence obligation’, which is one of the general obligations under s912A(1) of the Corporations Act.
Responsible Managers are the people that a licensee appoints to demonstrate to ASIC that it has the knowledge, skills and experience required to provide the financial services it is authorised to on its Australian Financial Services licence (AFSL).
For information on relevant legislation and important information surrounding your licensing obligations please refer to ASIC’s Regulatory Index.
Are you applying for an AFS Licence? Refer to ASICs AFS Licensing Kit for your obligations.
ASIC Regulatory Guide 105 AFS Licensing: Organisational competence (RG 105), provides detailed information about the requirements of responsible managers under an AFS licence.
For information on relevant legislation and important information surrounding your licensing obligations please refer to ASIC’s Regulatory Index.
A responsible manager possesses the following attributes:
- they must be directly responsible for significant day-to-day decisions in regard to the provision of financial services
- they must meet one of the five options for demonstrating knowledge and skills appropriate to their role, and
- they must be a ‘fit and proper’ person.
Persons likely to be responsible managers within an AFS licensee include:
- executive directors employed in a small to medium business
- managers in a dealing room environment
- business unit heads.
It is important to note that each financial product and service offered by a licensee must be matched by the skills and experience of at least one responsible manager
Our CPD program is an essential annual update for responsible managers and governance, risk and compliance leaders.
- Released annual each year (January – December)
- Contains five topics in alignment with what the regulators are prioritising
- Earns 15 CPD hours/points (3 CPD points per topic).
- Topics are separately assessed so can be studied one at a time, across the year.
- Assessment is via a multiple-choice quiz for each topic.
We see Compliance Consultants as essential to good customer outcomes. Self-licensing is on the rise, ASIC is increasing scrutiny of regulated entities, and numerous legislative changes and other reforms are prompting all manner of financial services firms to seek the assistance of a Compliance Consultant.
Please visit our Compliance Consultants directory.
To get started, either:
- Purchase course/s online. (You can add multiple courses to the cart.)
Please note: Online orders may take up to 1 business day to be processed and for your team to receive their course login details.
OR
Contact us for your Corporate Solution.
Need help finding the right course?

Regulatory News
-
29 January 2026
ASIC acts against 28 SMSF auditors, flags increased scrutiny on in-house audit breaches
29 January 202628 self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) auditors had their registrations cancelled, conditions imposed on them, or were disqualified by ASIC in the first half of the 25-26 financial year.
SMSF auditors are responsible for providing assurance over the $1 trillion in retirement savings held in Australia’s 661,000 SMSF accounts. They must act as trusted gatekeepers who contribute to the integrity and confidence in the SMSF regime.
Between 1 July 2025 and 31 December 2025, ASIC:
- disqualified 4 SMSF auditors,
- imposed additional conditions on 2 SMSF auditors, and
- cancelled the registration of 22 SMSF auditors.
ASIC took this action after finding breaches of professional obligations and standards, including:
- failing to comply with auditing and assurance standards, independence and continuing professional development requirements or to hold professional indemnity insurance,
- failing to provide ASIC with annual statements,
- failing to advise ASIC of changes to their contact details on the public register of SMSF auditors and not responding to regulatory compliance requests, and
- failing to carry out enough audit work to meet the practical experience requirements.
Andy Choi, Robert Morey, Andrew Orphanides and Ermis Yianni were disqualified from being SMSF auditors.
John Couroyannis and Dawid Maj had additional conditions imposed on their SMSF auditor registrations. The specific conditions can be viewed by searching the SMSF auditor’s name in ASIC’s Professional Registers Search.
Of the 22 auditors who had their registrations cancelled, 9 were cancelled over a failure to perform any significant audit work during the last 5 years. These auditors were referred to ASIC by the ATO, further adding to the 11 auditors who had their registrations cancelled last year as part of the ATO’s ongoing project to identify auditors who fail to maintain the necessary practical experience. These auditors were Yvonne Ching, Patrick Hoey, Christopher Leech, Rochelle Massih, Barry Mendel, Rick Siew, Thien Siow, John Whiting and Weifeng Zhu.
Ahmed Afifi and Fredel Twum were cancelled for not updating their contact details on the public register and failing to respond to regulatory compliance requests.
The registrations of 11 SMSF auditors were cancelled by ASIC for failing to comply with their obligation to lodge multiple annual statements.
View ASIC WebsiteASIC acts against 28 SMSF auditors, flags increased scrutiny on in-house audit breaches
28 self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) auditors had their registrations cancelled,... -
27 January 2026
Brendan Gunn pleads guilty to dealing with money reasonably suspected of being proceeds of crime
27 January 2026Former finance director Brendan Gunn of Brisbane, has pleaded guilty to dealing with more than $180,000 when it was reasonable to suspect that those funds were the proceeds of crime, derived from suspected international scams that targeted Australian investors.
At the time of offending, Mr Gunn was a director of Mormarkets Pty Ltd (Mormarkets), a company that accepted deposits from Australians for cryptocurrency and other supposed investment opportunities. While Mormarkets’ bank accounts were in operation, Mr Gunn was repeatedly notified of suspicious activity or reports of fraud, with the accounts progressively closed.
View ASIC WebsiteBrendan Gunn pleads guilty to dealing with money reasonably suspected of being proceeds of crime
Former finance director Brendan Gunn of Brisbane, has pleaded guilty... -
27 January 2026
BPS Financial to pay $14 million in penalties over crypto Qoin Wallet
27 January 2026The Federal Court has found BPS Financial Pty Ltd (BPS Financial) must pay $14 million in pecuniary penalties over its promotion and operation of its ‘Qoin Wallet’ crypto product.
BPS Financial promoted the Qoin Wallet as a non-cash payment facility linked to a digital crypto token called ‘Qoin’.
In 2024, the Federal Court found that BPS Financial engaged in unlicensed conduct over almost three years by issuing and providing financial advice about the Qoin Wallet without holding an Australian Financial Services License. The Court also found that BPS Financial engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct when it made several false and misleading representations about the Qoin Wallet.
In 2025, the Full Federal Court found that BPS Financial engaged in unlicensed conduct over an additional 10-month period because BPS could not rely on the ‘authorised representative’ exemption under the Corporations Act when issuing the Qoin Wallet.
View ASIC WebsiteBPS Financial to pay $14 million in penalties over crypto Qoin Wallet
The Federal Court has found BPS Financial Pty Ltd (BPS... -
27 January 2026
ASIC Key issues outlook 2026
27 January 2026ASIC is tracking major shifts across Australia’s financial system as pressures on consumers, markets and businesses intensify.
In 2026, continued cost‑of‑living strains for vulnerable Australians, rising debt and ongoing geopolitical tensions are adding volatility and uncertainty. At the same time, rapid advances in AI are transforming financial services—and fuelling a surge in AI‑powered cybercrime that is testing the resilience of companies and undermining public trust in AI‑driven decisions.
Market structure is continuing to evolve, with private markets expanding and digitalisation accelerating. Meanwhile, changes to ASX governance requirements may reshape how listed companies operate, influencing transparency and market confidence.
Global regulatory settings are also diverging, creating growing fragmentation that makes compliance more complex and increases the risk of uneven consumer protections.
These system‑wide forces cut across all sectors ASIC regulates.
Highlighting the key issues for 2026 helps direct attention to where risks are most likely to emerge and underscores where ASIC is focused to safeguard trust, integrity and confidence in Australia’s financial system.
View ASIC WebsiteASIC is tracking major shifts across Australia’s financial system as... -
23 January 2026
Fund manager sentenced to 6 years’ jail in $3 million Platinum Asset Management insider trading case
23 January 2026Former investment manager Rodney Forrest has been sentenced to 6 years’ imprisonment for insider trading and procuring others to trade in more than $3 million of Platinum Asset Management Limited (Platinum) shares (ASX: PTM).
In August 2024, Mr Forrest secretly accessed the computer of the Chairman of Regal Partners Limited (Regal) without permission and photographed confidential takeover documents (‘Pitch Deck’). He then traded and procured others to trade in Platinum shares before leaking details of the takeover to the media, making over $300,000 profit for himself.
The Federal Court in Sydney today sentenced Mr Forrest to five years imprisonment for insider trading and two years for procuring others to trade, with one year of the procuring offence to be served cumulatively with the insider trading offence. With a total sentence of six years and a non-parole period of three years, Mr Forrest will be eligible for parole on 22 January 2029.
His Honour Justice Bromwich’s sentence also took into account a further offence that Mr Forrest provided unlicensed financial services as an investment funds manager to two entities over a 9-month period.
This marks the first outcome for ASIC’s new specialist insider trading team which investigated and finalised the case within 16 months of the offending. The matter was prosecuted by the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) (CDPP).
View ASIC WebsiteFund manager sentenced to 6 years’ jail in $3 million Platinum Asset Management insider trading case
Former investment manager Rodney Forrest has been sentenced to 6... -
22 January 2026
AML/CTF transitional rules update
22 January 2026The Department of Home Affairs and AUSTRAC are working to finalise transitional rules to support a smooth implementation of the anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing (AML/CTF) reforms. The transitional rules will allow periods of time for reporting entities to adjust their business and processes to certain obligations, while still managing their ML/TF risk.
These transitional rules will ensure the reforms work effectively in practice and will allow additional time for certain reporting entities to develop systems and processes and to meet certain new obligations.
The transitional rules are made by the Minister for Home Affairs under Schedule 12 of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Amendment Act 2024. They are distinct from the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules 2025 made by the AUSTRAC CEO and also separate from any further amendments to the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Rules 2025 that may be made by AUSTRAC.
Over the coming weeks the Department of Home Affairs will publish an exposure draft of the transitional rules. Industry will have an opportunity to provide feedback at this stage.
View sourceAML/CTF transitional rules update
The Department of Home Affairs and AUSTRAC are working to... -
22 January 2026
AUSTRAC orders audit of Airwallex for suspected AML/CTF compliance failures
22 January 2026AUSTRAC has ordered the appointment of an external auditor to assess whether payment platform, Airwallex Designated Business Group (Airwallex DBG), is meeting its anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing (AML/CTF) obligations, following concerns about potential non-compliance.
AUSTRAC Chief Executive Officer, Brendan Thomas, said external audits are a critical regulatory tool to assess serious compliance concerns and to protect the financial system from criminal exploitation.
“We take this action where we suspect serious non-compliance, because we expect businesses to be actively managing their AML/CTF obligations,” Mr Thomas said.
“Strong compliance systems and timely reporting of suspicious activity are essential to disrupting criminal activities and illicit proceeds of crime generated from fraud, scams, illicit tobacco, drug trafficking and payments relating to crimes such as child sexual exploitation.”
“As a global payment platform that facilitates the transfer of funds to multiple jurisdictions, AUSTRAC is concerned with Airwallex’s transaction monitoring program has not been attuned to the full range of risks it faces and that the company hasn’t demonstrated an acceptable understanding of who its customers are and what reporting may be required.
“Our concerns also extend to how well Airwallex identifies and reports on suspicious matters and the effective oversight of these important obligations.”
The auditor, appointed under section 162 of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006, will examine whether the business is complying with key AML/CTF requirements including:
- maintaining an AML/CTF program and complying with that program
- operating an ongoing customer due diligence program
- meeting suspicious matter reporting obligations.
The auditor must report their findings to AUSTRAC within 180 days of appointment. The scope of the audit is determined by AUSTRAC and will be conducted at Airwallex DBG’s expense.
The outcomes of the audit will assist Airwallex DBG to comply with anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing obligations and inform AUSTRAC whether any further regulatory action is required.
View sourceAUSTRAC orders audit of Airwallex for suspected AML/CTF compliance failures
AUSTRAC has ordered the appointment of an external auditor to... -
22 January 2026
APRA monitors in1Bank return of deposits
22 January 2026The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) notes today’s announcement by in1Bank Limited (in1Bank) that it intends to return all funds to depositors and relinquish its licence to operate as an authorised deposit-taking institution (ADI).
The decision to relinquish its ADI licence has been taken by in1Bank.
APRA will monitor the return of all deposits to in1Bank depositors in an orderly and timely manner. During the return of deposit process, in1Bank’s depositors remain protected by the Financial Claims Scheme (FCS).
Customers with questions about deposits or accounts should contact in1Bank directly.
View APRA WebsiteAPRA monitors in1Bank return of deposits
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) notes today’s announcement by in1Bank Limited... -
21 January 2026
Australian Information Commissioner highlights improved transparency and integrity for government agencies in automated decision-making
21 January 2026The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) has identified opportunities for Australian Government agencies to improve transparency in the use of automated decision-making (ADM). ADM refers to the use of technology to automate decision-making processes. It is used across government in areas such as social services, taxation, aged care and veterans’ entitlements.
Australian Information Commissioner, Elizabeth Tydd said “Information about decision-making and the exercise of agencies functions is important information for the Australian community. It improves integrity, accountability and trust. The Information Publication Scheme (IPS) requires this type of information to be available to the public. The intended benefit of this Report is to inject clarity and certainty for agencies and the community regarding the operation of the Australian access to information scheme in the context of digital government.”
The OAIC’s latest Report, Automated decision-making and public reporting under the Freedom of Information Act, follows a desktop review conducted in October 2025 of the websites of 23 government agencies authorised to use ADM. The review assessed how agencies disclose their use of ADM as ‘operational information’ required to be published under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act). The Report acknowledges that technology has altered the operating environment of agencies and greater guidance is required to ensure that agencies are well placed to meet their existing obligations.
Australian Information Commissioner, Elizabeth Tydd said “The OAIC will begin consultation to update the Information Commissioner Guidelines as a priority in 2026.”
The Report highlights good practice but also opportunities for improvement for agencies to meet their obligations under the FOI Act to proactively publish information through the IPS. The Report also highlights the positive impact existing IPS obligations have in ensuring that transparency and accountability of actions and decisions are improved in the Australian Public Service under the Commonwealth Integrity Strategy– external site .
View sourceThe Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) has identified... -
21 January 2026
ASIC Symposium: The Asia Pacific opportunity – Innovating for growth
21 January 2026Wednesday 4 March 2026 | 2.00 pm – 7.00 pm | International Convention Centre Sydney
From quantum computing and AI to tokenisation, technology is reshaping markets. Asia Pacific is home to dynamic, digitally native markets and proactive cross border collaboration.
Join us for a discussion on the role regulation will play in promoting innovation and what it takes to safeguard stability amid rapid disruption.
Regulators, market leaders and innovators will unpack the opportunities, risks and policy responses that will define the next decade. Be part of the conversation setting the pace for resilient, fair and efficient markets.
Coinciding with ASIC’s 35th anniversary, the Symposium is a milestone opportunity to reflect on developments in financial services.
View ASIC WebsiteASIC Symposium: The Asia Pacific opportunity – Innovating for growth
Wednesday 4 March 2026 | 2.00 pm – 7.00 pm | International... -
20 January 2026
ASIC secures nearly $40 million in refunds to investors and drives change after CFD sector falls short
20 January 2026ASIC has secured the return of nearly $40 million to more than 38,000 retail investors and driven substantial compliance improvement across Australia’s contracts for difference (CFD) sector following a whole of industry review.
CFDs allow investors to speculate on the price movements of assets such as shares, currencies or commodities, without owning them. Between October 2024 and December 2025, ASIC reviewed 52 licensed CFD issuers, requiring them to show how they were distributing their high-risk products.
In the report, Risky business: Driving change in CFD issuers’ distribution practices (REP 828), ASIC found widespread weaknesses in how CFD issuers complied with their design and distribution obligations (DDO), ASIC’s CFD product intervention order (PIO) and regulatory reporting requirements.
ASIC found that more than half the CFD sector had contravened the PIO by offering ‘margin discounts’ to retail clients who took on opposing long and short positions. These investors incurred higher funding costs but could not profit from their opposing CFD positions.
View ASIC WebsiteASIC has secured the return of nearly $40 million to... -
5 January 2026
Treasury recently closed consultation on the draft law package and position paper to implement the Scams Prevention Framework (SPF)
5 January 2026The SPF creates world leading protections against scams. It creates new obligations and rules for certain businesses in sectors targeted by scammers.
Related content
- Scams Prevention Framework – exposure draft legislation
- Scams – mandatory industry codes consultation
The SPF creates world leading protections against scams. It creates... -
23 December 2025
APRA imposes additional licence conditions on Diversa Trustees Limited
23 December 2025The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has imposed additional licence conditions on Diversa Trustees Limited (Diversa) to address prudential concerns relating to its investment governance frameworks and practices, including oversight of platform investment options made available to members.
Diversa acts as trustee for 10 registrable superannuation entities and has approximately 291,000 member accounts and over $15 billion in funds under management.
The additional licence conditions follow APRA’s recent thematic review of the investment governance, strategic planning and member outcomes practices of superannuation trustees that offer platforms (Platform Trustees). Broadly, the review identified deficiencies in Diversa’s onboarding processes and practices, investment option monitoring and reporting, and management of conflicts of interest.
Specifically, APRA’s review of Diversa identified concerns regarding the:
- onboarding of new investment options, including the lack of sufficiently rigorous, well-defined and consistently applied investment selection criteria;
- adequacy of operational due diligence undertaken in relation to new investment options; and
- adequacy of Diversa’s investment monitoring and reporting framework.
APRA requires assurance, with appropriate oversight by an independent expert, that Diversa’s investment governance framework and practices are fit for purpose in their design and operation.
View APRA WebsiteAPRA imposes additional licence conditions on Diversa Trustees Limited
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has imposed additional licence... -
22 December 2025
Pump and dump scammers put regulators on high alert
22 December 2025So called ‘pump and dump’ operators – unscrupulous actors who start rumours about small cap securities to inflate the share price in the hope of making a quick profit, are increasingly targeting Australian investors ahead of the holiday period, with a notable rise in reports to the regulator.
ASIC is warning the public to be vigilant about widespread, coordinated pump and dump schemes targeting retail investors, including Australians trading in overseas markets, who can be tricked into buying thinly traded overseas stocks that are then rapidly sold down by the promoters once the price has been inflated.
ASIC has also observed scammers fraudulently using the identity of Australian celebrities to lure victims into messaging apps like WhatsApp where they are directed to buy shares.
This warning comes as four people involved in a coordinated scheme to pump up Australian share prices, before dumping them at inflated prices were sentenced today in Downing Street Court.
View ASIC WebsitePump and dump scammers put regulators on high alert
So called ‘pump and dump’ operators – unscrupulous actors who... -
19 December 2025
ASIC bans former MWL financial services adviser and former UGC Head of Advice Louis Van Coppenhagen for 7 years
19 December 2025ASIC has banned Melbourne-based financial adviser Louis Van Coppenhagen from providing financial services, controlling an entity that carries on a financial services business or performing any function involved in the carrying on of a financial services business for 7 years.
ASIC found that Mr Van Coppenhagen, while authorised by MWL Financial Services Pty Ltd (MWL), gave inappropriate advice to certain clients which was not in their best interests. Mr Van Coppenhagen recommended certain MWL clients invest most of their superannuation into the ‘High Growth’ or ‘Growth’ class of the Shield Master Fund (Shield) which were high risk investments.
ASIC also found that Mr Van Coppenhagen, while authorised by United Global Capital Pty Ltd (UGC), was instrumental to the implementation of UGC’s advice model including preparing a template Advice Proposal Document. ASIC cancelled UGC’s licence for providing conflicted personal advice concerning highly speculative investments.
ASIC has reason to believe that Mr Van Coppenhagen is not a fit and proper person, is not competent and is likely to contravene a financial services law.
The banning order took effect from 16 December 2025.
View ASIC WebsiteASIC has banned Melbourne-based financial adviser Louis Van Coppenhagen from... -
19 December 2025
Macquarie Securities admits to misleading conduct and agrees to pay $35 million for systemic failures
19 December 2025Macquarie Securities (Australia) Limited (MSAL) has admitted to misleading conduct in relation to the misreporting millions of short sales over several years, caused by repeated failures in its systems and processes.
View ASIC WebsiteMacquarie Securities (Australia) Limited (MSAL) has admitted to misleading conduct... -
19 December 2025
Federal Court orders $250 million combined penalties against ANZ
19 December 2025The Federal Court has ordered Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (ANZ) pay $250 million in penalties for widespread misconduct and systemic risk failures affecting the Australian Government, taxpayers and at least 65,000 retail bank customers.
These are the largest combined penalties ASIC has ever secured against a single entity.
His Honour Justice Jonathan Beach increased the penalty for ANZ’s inaccurate reporting of secondary bond market turnover data by $10 million, bringing the penalty in relation to that misconduct to $50 million.
The outcome is in relation to four separate court proceedings spanning misconduct across ANZ’s Institutional and Retail divisions, announced in September 2025 (25-201MR).
View ASIC WebsiteFederal Court orders $250 million combined penalties against ANZ
The Federal Court has ordered Australia and New Zealand Banking... -
19 December 2025
Federal Court orders $925,000 in penalties against RM Capital and SMSF Club for conflicted remuneration breaches
19 December 2025The Federal Court has ordered Australian financial services licensee RM Capital Pty Ltd to pay a $575,000 penalty and its authorised representative The SMSF Club Pty Ltd to pay a $350,000 penalty over conflicted remuneration breaches.
The penalties follow a Federal Court finding in February 2024 that RM Capital had failed to take reasonable steps between August 2013 and August 2016 to ensure that SMSF Club did not accept conflicted remuneration.
The Court also made findings that on multiple occasions between November 2014 and July 2016 SMSF Club accepted conflicted remuneration. It found that SMSF Club received a total of $135,863.65 in referral fees from real estate agent Positive RealEstate Pty Ltd (for assisting SMSF Club clients to set up a self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) and purchase property from Positive RealEstate.
The referral fees were paid as part of a referral agreement between SMSF Club and Positive Real Estate. On each occasion it accepted a referral fee, SMSF Club breached the provision of the Corporations Act which prohibits an authorised representative from accepting conflicted remuneration.
As the licensee that authorised SMSF Club to provide financial services, RM Capital contravened s963F of the Corporations Act by failing to take reasonable steps to ensure SMSF Club did not accept the payments.
View ASIC WebsiteThe Federal Court has ordered Australian financial services licensee RM... -
18 December 2025
Netwealth admits to First Guardian failures and agrees to compensate affected members $100 million
18 December 2025Netwealth has agreed to pay over $100 million in compensation to more than 1,000 Australians who invested their superannuation in the First Guardian Master Fund and has admitted it contravened the Corporations Act.
ASIC has commenced proceedings in the Federal Court against Netwealth Superannuation Services Pty Ltd (NSS) and Netwealth Investments Limited (NIL), as trustees of the Netwealth Superannuation Master Fund (NSMF).
NSS and NIL have admitted they failed to obtain and therefore did not assess sufficient information about the First Guardian Master Fund, or make sufficient independent enquiries, to understand or evaluate the investment risk in the First Guardian Diversified Class and Growth Class prior to or while offering them as investment options to NSMF members.
ASIC will seek orders that NSS and NIL failed to do all things necessary to ensure that the financial services covered by their financial services licences were provided efficiently, honestly and fairly.
ASIC has also accepted a court-enforceable undertaking from NSS and NIL to ensure members are compensated 100% of the amounts they invested in First Guardian less any amounts withdrawn. The compensation payments will be made by 30 January 2026.
View ASIC WebsiteNetwealth admits to First Guardian failures and agrees to compensate affected members $100 million
Netwealth has agreed to pay over $100 million in compensation... -
18 December 2025
ASIC improves and simplifies technological and operational resilience guidance
18 December 2025ASIC has today released a series of updates to improve and simplify its regulatory guidance on complying with technological and operational resilience rules for market participants and market operators.
Resilient market participants and market operators are essential to the integrity of our securities and futures markets and to the efficient functioning of the economy.
The updates are the third stage of ASIC’s work to review and clarify guidance relating to Chapters 8A and 8B of the ASIC Market Integrity Rules (Securities Markets) 2017 and the ASIC Market Integrity Rules (Futures Markets) 2017 (Resilience Rules) set out in:
- Regulatory Guide 265 Guidance on ASIC market integrity rules for participants of securities markets (RG 265)
- Regulatory Guide 266 Guidance on ASIC market integrity rules for participants of futures markets (RG 266), and
- Regulatory Guide 172 Financial markets: Domestic and overseas operators (RG 172).
The updates align with ASIC’s commitment to regulatory simplification and include changes to reduce repetition and the length of guidance, as well as structural improvements. Further, the updates:
- incorporate guidance on arrangements for identifying critical business services previously shared in September 2024 in a letter to participants
- give certainty that critical business services arrangements may leverage existing resilience frameworks, including service provider’s business continuity plans and redundancy arrangements for outsourcing arrangements, where suitable
- confirm that, in some situations, full redundancy arrangements may not be required for all critical business services
- clarify thresholds for identifying and reporting major events to ASIC
- remove referenced to superseded APRA standards and guidance.
The updates also incorporate class waivers ASIC granted in August 2025 to provide relief from some requirements for outsourcing arrangements where supply of energy or communications services were identified as critical business services.
View ASIC WebsiteASIC improves and simplifies technological and operational resilience guidance
ASIC has today released a series of updates to improve...